{"id":9844,"date":"2010-12-19T14:29:59","date_gmt":"2010-12-19T14:29:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=9844"},"modified":"2010-12-19T14:29:59","modified_gmt":"2010-12-19T14:29:59","slug":"browns-vs-bengals-spread-betting-picks-week-15-national-football-league","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/browns-vs-bengals-spread-betting-picks-week-15-national-football-league\/","title":{"rendered":"Browns vs. Bengals Spread Betting Picks Week 15 National Football League"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/scoresoddspicks.com\/nfl.html\">NFL schedule<\/a> features a matchup between the Browns vs. Bengals.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=13\">sportsbooks experts<\/a> have posted the odds on this game as Cincinnati -1 with a total of 40.<\/p>\n<p>Inspection of rushing yards per attempt has the eminence in the hands of Cleveland by .4.<\/p>\n<p>The supremacy in yards per reception is property of Cleveland by .2.<\/p>\n<p>The indispensible yards per point on offense is retained by Cincinnati by .7.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bettorsadvice.com\/\">Sports handicapping picks<\/a> used by <strong>professional gamblers says the must-bet <\/strong>is: Matt Rivers is in absolute love with this Sunday NFL slate and I really can\u2019t wait. But, there is still a matter at hand first and it\u2019s called Saturday. Two high quality plays that will cash the ticket and have us roll into another winning Sunday. 400,000* Northern Illinois-Fresno State and a 200,000* on the hardwoods between Iona and Syracuse. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">Click now to purchase<\/a><\/p>\n<p>On defense, the finer yards per rush numbers are occupied by Cleveland by .5.<\/p>\n<p>The higher-level calculations in yards per reception on defense are belonging to Cincinnati by .2.<\/p>\n<p>The better-graded yards per point on defense are associated with Cleveland by 4.9.<\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Spread betting trends <\/strong>(all records are against the spread): Cleveland 15-3 in road games vs. a team with a losing home record. They are 10-22 after allowing less than 15 points in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>Cleveland is 16-34 as home favorites, 5-16 following a SU loss of more than 14 points, 1-8 versus an opponent with a losing record.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Over\/under trends: <\/strong> Cleveland under 23-9 after allowing more than 150 yards rushing in their previous game. Cincinnati under 9-3 home favorites.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week\u2019s NFL schedule features a matchup between the Browns vs. Bengals. The sportsbooks experts have posted the odds on this game as Cincinnati -1 with a total of 40. Inspection of rushing yards per attempt has the eminence in the hands of Cleveland by .4. The supremacy in yards per reception is property of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/browns-vs-bengals-spread-betting-picks-week-15-national-football-league\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Browns vs. Bengals Spread Betting Picks Week 15 National Football League<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9844"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9844\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9845,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9844\/revisions\/9845"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}