{"id":9691,"date":"2010-12-09T17:46:10","date_gmt":"2010-12-09T17:46:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=9691"},"modified":"2010-12-09T18:00:39","modified_gmt":"2010-12-09T18:00:39","slug":"college-football-bowl-betting-previews-2010-11-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/college-football-bowl-betting-previews-2010-11-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"College Football Bowl Betting Previews 2010-11, Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s part 1 of the annual bowl betting breakdowns for 2010-11 NCAA football picks in which we look at the New Mexico Bowl, Humanitarian Bowl, New Orleans Bowl, and St. Petersburg Bowl.<\/p>\n<p>OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/p\/nfl-football-betting.html\">football betting<\/a> match-up using key numbers employed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/\">professional gamblers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>We commence with the New Mexico Bowl: UTEP vs. BYU.<\/p>\n<p>In comparing yards per rush on offense, the better numbers belong to Texas El Paso by .4.<\/p>\n<p>As far as passing yards per completion on the offensive side of the ball, the upper hand is for UTEP by 1.9.<\/p>\n<p>According to yards per point, the more efficient offense is UTEP by .6.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively the more stingy team based on yards per rush is Brigham Young by .8.<\/p>\n<p>The superior defense in terms of passing yards per completion is UTEP by 1.0.<\/p>\n<p>The yards per point statistic used by the best <a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/\">sports handicappers<\/a> says the superior defense is Texas El Paso, but by just .1<\/p>\n<p>BYU\u2019s turnover margin is four better.<\/p>\n<p>Now sports betting experts look to the Humanitarian Bowl Northern Illinois vs. Fresno State.<\/p>\n<p>In comparing yards per rush on offense, the superiority from a statistical standpoint goes to Northern Illinois by a wide margin of 2.1.<\/p>\n<p>Passing yards per completion is another gauge utilized by bettors. The advantage is possessed by Fresno State by .6.<\/p>\n<p>Possibly the most utilized number by professional bettors is yards per point. From the offensive viewpoint the positive checkmark is in the column of NIU by .6.<\/p>\n<p>Now go to the key numbers on the defensive side of the ball. The yards per rush guide says the better run defense is the Huskies by .4.<\/p>\n<p>The superior passing yards per completion data on defense give the upper hand to Northern Illinois by .4.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of yards per point, the better defense is Northern Illinois, forcing 5.6 more<\/p>\n<p>Next up in the New Orleans Bowl between Ohio vs. Troy State.<\/p>\n<p>The superior team in terms of rushing yards per attempt on offense is Ohio by a slim .1.<\/p>\n<p>Also on offense, when it comes to yards per reception the figures give the eminence to Ohio by 1.7.<\/p>\n<p>Vegas sharps exploit yards per point. Data says the more adroit team in that classification is the Bobcats by 1.7.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively on yards per rush, the disparity favors Ohio by a large 1.3.<\/p>\n<p>The better team at stopping the air attack according to passing yards per completion is also the Bobcats by .7.<\/p>\n<p>Yards per point dictates the shrewder defense belongs to Ohio by 1.8.<\/p>\n<p>In net turnovers, the preeminence is Troy by two.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, insofar as Part 1, we peek at the St. Petersburg Bowl: Louisville vs. Southern Mississippi.<\/p>\n<p>The team that is better running the ball according to rushing yards per attempt is Louisville by .2.<\/p>\n<p>Passing yards per completion says the more productive passing squad is also the Cardinals by .7.<\/p>\n<p>Betting specialists employ yards per point, a number that on the offensive side of the ball favors Southern Miss by 3.3.<\/p>\n<p>Now it\u2019s time to focus on the numbers that the betting counselors cherish from a defensive standpoint. Yards per rush says the tougher defense is the Golden Eagles by .4.<\/p>\n<p>In juxtaposing yards per reception statistics, the margin on defense puts the positive checkmark in the column the Cardinals by 1.4.<\/p>\n<p>The often overlooked yards per point defensive advantage is Louisville forcing four more yards per point.<\/p>\n<p>The net turnover ratio edge belongs to Southern Miss by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong>For more information: <\/strong>The best <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bettorsadvice.com\/\">premium betting service<\/a> picks for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/p\/college-football-betting.html\">2010-11 college bowl betting<\/a> is <a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=1\">OffshoreInsiders.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s part 1 of the annual bowl betting breakdowns for 2010-11 NCAA football picks in which we look at the New Mexico Bowl, Humanitarian Bowl, New Orleans Bowl, and St. Petersburg Bowl. OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the football betting match-up using key numbers employed by professional gamblers. We commence with the New Mexico Bowl: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/college-football-bowl-betting-previews-2010-11-part-1\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">College Football Bowl Betting Previews 2010-11, Part 1<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9691"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9691\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9698,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9691\/revisions\/9698"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}