{"id":9234,"date":"2010-11-08T18:29:40","date_gmt":"2010-11-08T18:29:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=9234"},"modified":"2010-11-08T18:29:40","modified_gmt":"2010-11-08T18:29:40","slug":"espn-monday-night-football-predictions-against-the-spread","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/11\/espn-monday-night-football-predictions-against-the-spread\/","title":{"rendered":"ESPN Monday Night Football Predictions Against the Spread"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the stronger betting opportunities for bettors a contest between the Steelers vs. Bengals.<\/p>\n<p>The betting line has the point spread posted as Pittsburgh -5.5 or 6.0 with a total of 41.<\/p>\n<p>OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/p\/nfl-football-betting.html\">betting on football<\/a> match-up using key numbers employed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/\">Vegas insiders<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In comparing yards per rush on offense, the healthier records go to Pittsburgh by .2.<\/p>\n<p>Insofar as passing yards per completion on the offensive side of the ball, the advantage is for the Steelers at 1.6.<\/p>\n<p>According to yards per point, the not wasteful offense is the Pittsburgh Steelers by 1.7.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively the more miserly team based on yards per rush is Pittsburgh by 1.9.<\/p>\n<p>The more exceptional defense based on the stipulation of passing yards per completion is Pittsburgh by 1.2.<\/p>\n<p>The yards per point statistic used by the best <a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/\">sports handicappers<\/a> says the better defense is Pittsburgh by 6.0.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who to bet on according to the <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=140\"><strong>pick nation<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong>The Texans blew it late for Matt Rivers spoiling another winning day. No biggie, 10 of 13 on the positive side and another winning weekend which ain\u2019t too shabby and I go right back\u00a0to work here\u00a0and bash that Crookie once again. Footy and hoops for one low price including an extremely rare total in the NFL. I only release a few totals a year but when I do look the heck out!<\/p>\n<p>Three plays in all: 300,000* NFL total, 200,000* NFL side and a 200,000* between Denver and Chicago. 3-0 baby! <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">Click now to purchase<\/a> <strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the stronger betting opportunities for bettors a contest between the Steelers vs. Bengals. The betting line has the point spread posted as Pittsburgh -5.5 or 6.0 with a total of 41. OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the betting on football match-up using key numbers employed by Vegas insiders. In comparing yards per rush &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/11\/espn-monday-night-football-predictions-against-the-spread\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">ESPN Monday Night Football Predictions Against the Spread<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9234"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9236,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9234\/revisions\/9236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}