{"id":9194,"date":"2010-11-07T04:32:51","date_gmt":"2010-11-07T04:32:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=9194"},"modified":"2010-11-07T04:32:51","modified_gmt":"2010-11-07T04:32:51","slug":"week-9-nfl-lines-cardinals-vs-vikings-odds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/11\/week-9-nfl-lines-cardinals-vs-vikings-odds\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 9 NFL Lines: Cardinals vs. Vikings Odds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Presented is the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/\">Vegas runner<\/a> scrutiny of pulling together key achievement indicators from a betting approach on the bout between the Cardinals vs. Vikings.<\/p>\n<p>The Las Vegas odds are Minnesota -7.5 and 41.5.<\/p>\n<p>Originating with the yards per carry data, the higher value offense is Minnesota by .1.<\/p>\n<p>On the same part of the line of scrimmage, yards per catch bestows the control to the Vikings by 1.0.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=1\">Professional gamblers<\/a> exploit the yards per point angle. The more fruitful unit with the ball in their control is Arizona by 4.4.<\/p>\n<p>We shall make a distinction in the yardsticks on defense in a jiffy but firstly, the chief <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=2\">sport bet pick<\/a> in the handicapping activity <strong>on this game is <\/strong>The Power of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2007\/08\/masterlockline-com\/\">620 sports services<\/a> behind every selection, the MasterLockLine has tapped into an elite sports service pick on this game.<\/p>\n<p>Sports service out of Midwest is the No. 1 all-time CFB service in units won. Their highest rated plays are Executive Plays. On an 13-0 run with Executive Plays in college and NFL combined. Yesterday it was Boise State, Minnesota, Southern Miss, Marshall, Penn State. Two Executive Plays in NFL. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">Click now to purchase<\/a> or for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=53\">more information and a free pick<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In halting rushing attacks, the senior ranked defense in accordance with rushing yards per attempt is Minnesota by .5.<\/p>\n<p>The tighter defense in terms of yards per pass catch would be Minnesota by .8.<\/p>\n<p>The more troublesome defense making use of yards per point enlightenment is that of the Vikings by 2.1.<\/p>\n<p>On the better segment of turnover ratio is Minnesota by two.<\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n<p>Where to bet this game: Back by popular demand is <a href=\"http:\/\/affiliates.commissionaccount.com\/processing\/clickthrgh.asp?btag=a_1206b_609\">SportsBook\u2019s<\/a> most popular promotion: The $100,000.00 Perfect Parlay. <a href=\"http:\/\/affiliates.commissionaccount.com\/processing\/clickthrgh.asp?btag=a_1206b_609\">Get all the details.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Presented is the Vegas runner scrutiny of pulling together key achievement indicators from a betting approach on the bout between the Cardinals vs. Vikings. The Las Vegas odds are Minnesota -7.5 and 41.5. Originating with the yards per carry data, the higher value offense is Minnesota by .1. On the same part of the line &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/11\/week-9-nfl-lines-cardinals-vs-vikings-odds\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Week 9 NFL Lines: Cardinals vs. Vikings Odds<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9194"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9194\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9196,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9194\/revisions\/9196"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}