{"id":8536,"date":"2010-10-10T12:51:25","date_gmt":"2010-10-10T12:51:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=8536"},"modified":"2010-10-10T12:51:25","modified_gmt":"2010-10-10T12:51:25","slug":"buccaneers-vs-bengals-week-5-nfl-odds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/10\/buccaneers-vs-bengals-week-5-nfl-odds\/","title":{"rendered":"Buccaneers vs. Bengals Week 5 NFL Odds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Week 5 NFL betting info is hotter than Elizabeth Hawkenson.<\/p>\n<p>This week\u2019s football calendar includes a competition between the Buccaneers vs. Bengals.<\/p>\n<p>OffshoreInsiders.com gives an investigation of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/p\/nfl-football-betting.html\">football betting<\/a> match-up scrutinizing key numbers engaged by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/\">professional gamblers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In weigh against one team\u2019s yards per rush on offense against the other, the more advanced records favor Tampa Bay by .1.<\/p>\n<p>As far as passing yards per completion on the offensive side of the ball, the digits point towards Cincinnati by .5.<\/p>\n<p>Employing yards per point, the more effective offense is the Tampa Bay Buccaneers by .4.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best sportsbook bet on this game say the <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=140\"><strong>football betting experts<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong>against the spread: No handicapper has ever dominated any sport\u2014decade after decade\u2014the way GodsTips has the NFL going back to our scorephone days. On a 16-7 overall run in the NFL including the Jags +280 to Indianapolis and 10-4 with NFL Wise Guys, get 11 winners. Four are Wise Guys. Another is a moneyline Dandy Dog. Dandy Dogs are underdogs of 140 or more (this includes runline plays in which we get back 140 or more). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">Click now to purchase<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Defensively the most operative lineup based on yards per rush is the Cincinnati Bengals by .7<\/p>\n<p>The upper rated defense based on the provisions of passing yards per completion is Cincinnati by 2.5<\/p>\n<p>The yards per point statistic used by the best <a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/\">sports handicappers<\/a> says the superior defense is Tampa by 1.7.<\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Week 5 NFL betting info is hotter than Elizabeth Hawkenson. This week\u2019s football calendar includes a competition between the Buccaneers vs. Bengals. OffshoreInsiders.com gives an investigation of the football betting match-up scrutinizing key numbers engaged by professional gamblers. In weigh against one team\u2019s yards per rush on offense against the other, the more advanced records &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/10\/buccaneers-vs-bengals-week-5-nfl-odds\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Buccaneers vs. Bengals Week 5 NFL Odds<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8536"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8536\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8538,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8536\/revisions\/8538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}