{"id":8533,"date":"2010-10-10T12:31:31","date_gmt":"2010-10-10T12:31:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=8533"},"modified":"2010-10-10T12:31:31","modified_gmt":"2010-10-10T12:31:31","slug":"rams-vs-lions-sports-handicapping-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/10\/rams-vs-lions-sports-handicapping-information\/","title":{"rendered":"Rams vs. Lions Sports Handicapping Information"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the stronger betting opportunities for bettors a contest between the Rams and Lions.<\/p>\n<p>OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/p\/nfl-football-betting.html\">betting on football<\/a> match-up using key numbers employed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/\">Vegas insiders<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In comparing yards per rush on offense, the healthier records go to Detroit by .2 yards per rush.<\/p>\n<p>Insofar as passing yards per completion on the offensive side of the ball, the advantage is for no squad as they are dead even.<\/p>\n<p>According to yards per point, the not wasteful offense is the Rams, but by a measly .1.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively the more miserly team based on yards per rush is the Rams by .3.<\/p>\n<p>The more exceptional defense based on the stipulation of passing yards per completion is St. Louis by .8.<\/p>\n<p>The yards per point statistic used by the best <a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/\">sports handicappers<\/a> says the better defense is St. Louis by a prevailing 14.5.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who to bet on according to the <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=140\"><strong>pick nation<\/strong><\/a>:<strong> <\/strong>No handicapper has ever dominated any sport\u2014decade after decade\u2014the way GodsTips has the NFL going back to our scorephone days. On a 16-7 overall run in the NFL including the Jags +280 to Indianapolis and 10-4 with NFL Wise Guys, get 11 winners. Four are Wise Guys. Another is a moneyline Dandy Dog. Dandy Dogs are underdogs of 140 or more (this includes runline plays in which we get back 140 or more). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">Click now to purchase<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the stronger betting opportunities for bettors a contest between the Rams and Lions. OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the betting on football match-up using key numbers employed by Vegas insiders. In comparing yards per rush on offense, the healthier records go to Detroit by .2 yards per rush. Insofar as passing yards per &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/10\/rams-vs-lions-sports-handicapping-information\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Rams vs. Lions Sports Handicapping Information<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8533"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8533\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8535,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8533\/revisions\/8535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}