{"id":7712,"date":"2010-09-08T12:52:04","date_gmt":"2010-09-08T17:52:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=7712"},"modified":"2010-09-08T12:52:04","modified_gmt":"2010-09-08T17:52:04","slug":"nfl-wagering-ats-trends-for-week-1-2010-football","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/09\/nfl-wagering-ats-trends-for-week-1-2010-football\/","title":{"rendered":"NFL Wagering ATS Trends For Week 1 2010 Football"},"content":{"rendered":"

We continue our NFL betting trends<\/a> coverage with more of the Week 1 early games on Sunday. For anyone who missed NFL trends, part 1<\/a> or the college football betting trends<\/a>, always check out the \u201carticles\u201d section on OffshoreInsiders.com. All records are against the spread.<\/p>\n

SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 12<\/p>\n

Colts vs Texans<\/strong><\/p>\n

With two of the league\u2019s elite passing offenses going head to head, sports betting<\/a> sharps shouldn\u2019t be surprised to learn that the OVER is 9-1 over the last 10 meetings between these AFC South rivals. The Colts are strong within the division, going 4-1 ATS over their last five in the South, whereas the Texans are just 1-4 ATS over their last five divisional matchups.<\/p>\n

Browns vs Buccaneers<\/strong><\/p>\n

Who will cover the spread in the Toilet Bowl? On paper, the Browns look like an amazing play; they\u2019ve beaten seven straight spreads. But bettors should remember that the streak is a product of their improbable late-season run. Cleveland is still 1-9-1 ATS in its last 11 Week 1 games. Tampa seems to crumble at home, going 1-10 ATS over its last 11 games there.<\/p>\n

Bengals vs Patriots<\/strong><\/p>\n

Could this be the week\u2019s first sportsbook<\/a> upset? While Cincinnati is 1-7 ATS over its last eight, it tends to surprise early, going 11-5 ATS in its last 16 September games. The road team has also beaten the spread in four of the last five Bengals\/Patriots meetings.<\/p>\n

Raiders vs Titans<\/strong><\/p>\n

While the Raiders are 5-1 ATS in their last six against Tennessee, they\u2019re slow starters, beating the spread just once in their last five Week 1 games. Tennessee is the stronger early-season betting<\/a> play, going 9-2 over its last 11 September games, but it enters the matchup having lost five of six against the spread. Maybe the OVER\u00a0 is the better play; it\u2019s 5-1 in Oakland\u2019s last six in Week 1 and 4-1 in Tennessee\u2019s last five at home.<\/p>\n

Broncos vs Jaguars<\/strong><\/p>\n

Could bettors win some cash on Denver here? The Broncos are 7-3 ATS over their last 10 in Week 1 \u2013 remember the wild finish to open the season against Cincy last year? The underdog has also beaten the spread five straight times in this rivalry history. The Jags are ugly bets at home, losing 13 of 16 ATS. Will Denver put some points up? Its last five games have gone OVER the total.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We continue our NFL betting trends coverage with more of the Week 1 early games on Sunday. For anyone who missed NFL trends, part 1 or the college football betting trends, always check out the \u201carticles\u201d section on OffshoreInsiders.com. All records are against the spread. SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 12 Colts vs Texans With two of the … Continue reading NFL Wagering ATS Trends For Week 1 2010 Football<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7712"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7712\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7714,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7712\/revisions\/7714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}