{"id":7693,"date":"2010-09-07T15:09:19","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T20:09:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=7693"},"modified":"2010-09-07T15:09:19","modified_gmt":"2010-09-07T20:09:19","slug":"college-football-trends-michigan-notre-dame-florida-state-oklahoma-top-games","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2010\/09\/college-football-trends-michigan-notre-dame-florida-state-oklahoma-top-games\/","title":{"rendered":"College Football Trends: Michigan-Notre Dame, Florida State-Oklahoma Top Games"},"content":{"rendered":"

As Jim \u201cthe Anvil\u201d Neidhart and the Reggie Bush grab sports headlines, college football wagering<\/a> news has this week\u2019s point spread trends up.<\/p>\n

Time for Week 2 of college football betting<\/a>. Now we\u2019re nice and warmed up. Let\u2019s win some money. Here are some trends to watch for some of the marquee games this Saturday \u2013 starting with the early-day matchups.<\/p>\n

SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11<\/p>\n

South Florida (1-0) vs (3) Florida (1-0)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The South Florida Bulls tend to perform well against the spread when they\u2019re playing with confidence. They\u2019re 4-0 ATS in their last four after allowing fewer than 170 passing yards the previous game, 4-1 ATS in their last five after allowing fewer than 20 points the previous game and 5-2 ATS over their last seven following an ATS win. Meanwhile, though Florida is 8-2 ATS over its last 10 following an ATS loss, it\u2019s 1-4 ATS over its last five following a straight-up win over more than 20 points.<\/p>\n

Michigan (1-0) vs Notre Dame (1-0)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sports betting<\/a> players have a tough choice in this rivalry game because the Wolverines and Fighting Irish both show some alarming trends against the spread. Michigan is just 2-7 ATS over its last nine following a straight-up win and 1-4 ATS over its last five road games. But Notre Dame is 8-20 ATS over its last 28 home games and just 1-7 ATS over its last eight following a straight-up win. The safest bet is the OVER: it\u2019s 7-3 over the last 10 meetings and 5-0 over the last five meetings at Notre Dame.<\/p>\n

(20) Florida State vs (8) Oklahoma<\/strong><\/p>\n

Florida State is one of many powerhouse schools that rest on their laurels too much after big wins. It\u2019s just 7-21-1 in its last 29 after winning by 20 or more points the previous game. Though Oklahoma is 2-5 ATS in its last seven overall, it\u2019s 11-3-1 ATS in its last 15 September games and 6-1 ATS after allowing more than 280 passing yards the previous week.<\/p>\n

Colorado vs California<\/strong><\/p>\n

Teams seem to underestimate Colorado far too often; the Buffaloes are 8-2 ATS in their last 10 games versus teams with winning records. But California will work hard to put a hurt on Colorado; it\u2019s 12-5 ATS over its last 17 home games. Bears\u2019 games trend toward the OVER; it\u2019s 11-3-1 over their last 15 non-conference affairs.<\/p>\n

(12) Miami vs (2) Ohio State<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an exciting matchup \u2013 but perhaps an easy one to predict at the sportsbook<\/a>. Ohio State isn\u2019t just a school many bettors think will win it all this year; it\u2019s a juggernaut against the spread. The Buckeyes are 40-18 over their last 58 games ATS and 8-1 ATS in their last nine against teams with winning records. Miami looks like a risky play; it\u2019s 11-27 ATS over its last 38 games following an ATS win.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As Jim \u201cthe Anvil\u201d Neidhart and the Reggie Bush grab sports headlines, college football wagering news has this week\u2019s point spread trends up. Time for Week 2 of college football betting. Now we\u2019re nice and warmed up. Let\u2019s win some money. Here are some trends to watch for some of the marquee games this Saturday … Continue reading College Football Trends: Michigan-Notre Dame, Florida State-Oklahoma Top Games<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7693","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7693"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7693\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7695,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7693\/revisions\/7695"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}