{"id":2255,"date":"2008-10-09T09:02:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-09T14:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2008\/10\/wake-forest-clemson-sportsbook-preview\/"},"modified":"2008-10-09T09:02:00","modified_gmt":"2008-10-09T14:02:00","slug":"wake-forest-clemson-sportsbook-preview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2008\/10\/wake-forest-clemson-sportsbook-preview\/","title":{"rendered":"Wake Forest-Clemson Sportsbook Preview"},"content":{"rendered":"

promo\/euro<\/a> <\/p>\n

Here is the official Clemson-Wake<\/st1:PLACENAME> Forest<\/st1:PLACETYPE><\/st1:PLACE> preview for football betting<\/a>. Clemson is 3-2 straight up but 0-3 to the number with all three lined games going under the total. This is the Tigers first real road game as they played Alabama<\/st1:PLACE><\/st1:STATE> on a neutral field. <\/p>\n

Wake<\/st1:PLACENAME> Forest<\/st1:PLACETYPE><\/st1:PLACE> is 3-1 straight up, 2-2 against the spread but the road team has covered all four of their games. Wake<\/st1:PLACENAME> Forest<\/st1:PLACETYPE><\/st1:PLACE> is 10-6 against the spread in the series, even though Clemson is 11-5 straight up. <\/p>\n

Clemson’s struggles are not on offense. They get 5.0 yards per rush to teams normally getting 4.6 and 7.6 passing yards per attempt to 7.0, which amounts to 6.3 yards per play to 5.7. <\/p>\n

Those same ratings<\/font><\/a> say that Clemson is above average defensively. They hold teams to .2 yards per rush below their normal average and .5 less per pass attempt. <\/p>\n

Wake<\/st1:PLACENAME> Forest<\/st1:PLACETYPE><\/st1:PLACE>‘s strength is defensively. On offense, they are getting a paltry 2.4 yards per rush against teams normally allowing 3.0 and 6.5 passing yards per attempt to 6.8. <\/p>\n

However, on defense, the numbers are impressive. They are allowing just 4.0 yards per rush to teams normally getting 5.5 and 5.6 yards per pass attempt to teams normally getting 7.6. Overall they are holding foes to 1.6 yards per play below their normal average. “That is one of the best ratios in the country,” says the top football handicapper ever Mike Godsey of GodsTips. <\/p>\n

Here are some betting trends. All records are against the spread: Wake<\/st1:PLACENAME> Forest<\/st1:PLACETYPE><\/st1:PLACE> is 1-9 at home off a bye week and 9-24 at home if their last game was at home. Wake though is 8-1 in virtual pick ‘em<\/span> games (+\/- three points or less either way). They are also 8-0 off ATS loss and 8-2 after getting less than 100 yards rushing last game. <\/p>\n

Who will cover? The power of 620 sports services<\/a><\/span> behind every selection says that Statmaven Sports is No. 1 all-time on as far as plays that have risen to the level to be re-released. Rankings trace back to the 976-LOCK scorephone days through the SuperLockLine and are all-sports combined.  <\/span>In other words, their highest rated plays have proven since 1980 to be as good as any sports service. Momentum Angle is +175.4 units on Clemson\/Wake Forest. Also get the top service play on UAB<\/span>-Houston inclusive in the same $16 Click now to purchase<\/font><\/a> <\/p>\n

Clemson is 0-7 after getting less than 170 yards passing last game and 1-7 off ATS loss. The Tigers have gone under the total in six straight. <\/p>\n

<\/a> <\/p>\n

OffshoreInsiders.com<\/b><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the official Clemson-Wake Forest preview for football betting. Clemson is 3-2 straight up but 0-3 to the number with all three lined games going under the total. This is the Tigers first real road game as they played Alabama on a neutral field. Wake Forest is 3-1 straight up, 2-2 against the spread … Continue reading Wake Forest-Clemson Sportsbook Preview<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}