This is Part-5 where the Center of the Handicapping The offensive stats are close. The numbers give While Missouri gets 6.1 more first downs per game on 35.4 It\u2019s see-saw on defense as well. On defense, it\u2019s the Wolverines who are superior. They High powered Tech gets 6.1 more first downs per game, It\u2019s pretty close on defense. The Cavs allow 62.7 less Contrary to what many may believe, USC allows 3.3 fewer first downs per game on 96.6 fewer The defensive comparison shows the teams closer than many <\/span> <\/body> This is Part-5 where the Center of the Handicapping Universe Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of the bowl games. This report entails games of Jan. 1. Wisconsin-Tennessee The offensive stats are close. Tennessee gets 2.0 more first downs per game on 25.1 more total yards. However, Wisconsin has the most modest of … Continue reading Bowl Breakdowns, Part 5<\/span>
\nUniverse Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of
\nthe bowl games. This report entails games of Jan. 1.Wisconsin-Tennessee
\ngets 2.0 more first downs per game on 25.1 more total yards. However,
\nhas the most modest of edges, getting .1 more yards per play. Yet the
\nconflicting stats, the Badgers get 1.1 more passing yards per attempt and 2.7
\nmore passing yards per reception.
\nthe check marks on defense. They allow 5.3 fewer first downs per game on 83.9
\nless yards. The Volunteers permit .2 fewer rushing yards per attempt. Every
\nother comparison gives a small edge to the Badgers. But
\nhas a turnover ratio of nine better than Wisky. Arkansas-Missouri
\n
\nmore yards, Arkansas has the upper hand in the most important category
\n(according to
\nbetting expert<\/a> Joe Duffy), getting .3 more yards per play. But it\u2019s a
\nbattle of differing styles as much as any bowl game.
\npicks up 131.7 more rushing yards per game; Mizzou<\/span>
\n167.1 more passing yards per game. The Razorbacks get a significantly more 1.8
\nmore rushing yards per attempt but
\n.8 more passing yards per attempt. The Razorbacks have a more efficient passing
\ngame, accumulating .9 more passing yards per reception, yet the Tigers complete
\n11.9 more percent of their pass attempts.
\nallows 29.1 less rushing yards per game, but Arkanas<\/span>
\n50.3 fewer passing yards per game. The two most significant differences on defense
\nare the Tigers permitting 1.8 less passing yards per reception, but the
\nRazorbacks with a humungous passing percentage against superiority of 16.6. Michigan-Florida
\nthe huge upper hand on offense getting 4.7 more first downs per game,
\nyards per play including 2.8 more passing yards per attempt. The Gators also
\ncomplete 13.1 more percent of their passes.
\nallow 4.7 less first downs per game on .5 fewer yards per play. However,
\nallows 27.4 fewer rushing yards per game on .6 less rushing yards per attempt.
\nadvantage is 98.2 fewer passing yards per game on 1.2 less passing yards per
\nattempt and 1.6 less passing yards per reception.
\nhas a turnover ratio upper hand of seven.
\n210.8 total yards per game on 2.4 more yards per play. However, the Cavs have
\nthe advantage in rushing yards per game by 61.8. The Red Raiders accumulate 2.1
\nmore passing yards per attempt. They also have a commanding superiority in
\ncompletion percentage by 13.8. <\/p>\n
\nrushing yards per game, and 1.0 less rushing yards per attempt. But the Red
\nRaiders permit 14.2 fewer passing yards per game.
\nyards per attempt, passing yards per reception and passing percentage against.
\nhas the upper hand in turnover ratio by nine. Illinois-USC
\nactually averages a slight 4.9 more total yards per game on offense led by a
\nsuperiority of
\nrushing. They also get 1.0 more rushing yards per attempt and 1.0 more passing
\nyards per reception. The Trojans though complete 5.8 more percent of their
\npasses.
\ntotal yards per game and 1.1 less yards per play. It\u2019s a clean sweep of
\nsuperiority on defense for Southern Cal giving up 1.3 less passing yards per
\nattempt, 1.4 less passing yards per reception, and a completion percentage
\nagainst of 4.8 less. Hawaii-Georgia
\n7.3 more first downs per game on 143.6 more yards offensively. However, the
\nBulldogs run the ball much better getting 97.6 more yards per game on .8 more
\nrushing yards per attempt. The Rainbow Warriors have a completion percentage of
\n16.8 better than the Dawgs<\/span>.
\nmay think. UGA<\/span> allows 24.7 fewer yards per game, but
\nactually concedes .2 fewer yards per play.
\nallows .6 fewer passing yards per attempt on .7 less passing yards per
\nreception. Turnover ratio comparison goes to the Bulldogs by five.
\n<\/span><\/b>is your one-stop shop for bowl betting. We have the latest
\nor as an alternative
\nperspective. <\/span>
\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"