This is Part-3 where the Center of the Handicapping To say the least, these two teams are closely matched However, the Spartans do get .9 more rushing yards per Boston College allows19.9 fewer total yards per game on .7 It\u2019s The only exception to The teams could not be closer offensively with A&M The Aggies<\/span> have a turnover ratio <\/body> This is Part-3 where the Center of the Handicapping Universe Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of the bowl games. This report entails games of Dec. 28-Dec. 29. Michigan State-Boston College To say the least, these two teams are closely matched statistically on both sides of the ball. BC does get 3.3 more … Continue reading Bowl Breakdowns, Part 3<\/span>
\nUniverse Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of
\nthe bowl games. This report entails games of Dec. 28-Dec. 29.
\nstatistically on both sides of the ball. BC does get 3.3 more first downs per
\ngame but they are dead even in yards per play.
\n
\nper game but
\naccrues 103.8 more passing yards. It\u2019s a net edge of 10.3 for the Eagles.
\nattempt and .8 more passing yards per reception.
\nless yards per play and 66 fewer rushing yards per game. However,
\nareas of yards per play, BC has the upper hand in rushing yards per attempt
\nallowed of 1.6, passing yards per attempt of .6 and passing yards per reception
\nof .9. Even the turnover ratio is close with
\nhaving a net edge of two. TCU<\/span><\/span>
\nas the mathematically superior team on the offensive side of the ball, but
\ngets 3.7 more first downs per game, 124.8 more yards, 1.4<\/span>
\nmore yards per play. This is on 1.3 more rushing yards per attempt, 1.8 more
\npassing yards per attempt and 1.2 more passing yards per reception. The Cougars
\nalso complete 9.5 more percent of the passes.
\nwinning every offensive and TCU<\/span> every defensive matchup
\nis
\npercent pass completions on defense. Other than that, the Horned Frogs are
\nallowing 46.6 fewer total yards per game, on 1.1 less yards per play. The
\nbiggest edge is in yards per catch allowed at 3.6.
\nhas slight total yards advantages on both sides of the ball, but not so much in
\nall the yards per rush\/pass\/play categories. OSU<\/span> has
\noffense. However the Terps get a slight
\ngets 1.8 more passing yards per attempt and 1.3 more passing yards per
\nreception. The Terrapins also complete 8.8 more percent of the passes.
\nallows 42.9 less yards per game and .8 less yards per play.
\nthough does allow 18.8 fewer passing yards. The Beavers allow 1.8 fewer rushing
\nyards per attempt, but
\nallows .2 less passing yards per attempt and 1.9 less passing yards per
\nreception.
\nallows 7.4 less percent of their opponents<\/span> passes to
\nbe completed.
\nturnover ratio advantage of six.
\nmore total yards per game on 1.4 more yards per play. UCF<\/span>
\ngets 1.6 more rushing yards per attempt and 1.6 more passing yards per attempt
\nas well as 1.3 more passing yards per reception. The Golden Eagles complete 7.2
\nmore percent of their passes.
\nhas the advantage in more defensive categories though. They allow 66.1 less
\npassing yards, though
\nrushing yards. The biggest edge is in turnover ratio where UCF<\/span>
\nis 10 better. Penn
\nState-Texas A&M
\ngetting a measly 3.8 more yards per game but they are dead even in yards per
\nplay and close in ever other category.
\nsweeps the defense, allowing 109.4 less yards per game on 1.3 less yards per
\nplay. The Nittany Lions allow 1.5 less rushing yards per attempt and 1.3
\npassing yards per attempt.
\nof seven better. <\/span>
\nis offering complete bowl packages for Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips for $149, Stevie
\nVincent\u2019s BetOnSports360 for $199 or both for $299. Both handicappers give
\ndetailed analysis on every pick. Sign up now at OffshoreInsiders.com<\/span><\/a><\/b>
\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"