This is Part-1 where the Center of the Handicapping The big underdogs Midshipmen have the numbers on the Navy gets 1.7 more rushing yards per attempt and 2.8 more The Utes come back and have the edge in most defensive Likewise Florida Atlantic gets the nod defensively, but The Bearcats have the numbers on offense getting 64.2 more Defensively it\u2019s very close. They are New The Cougars are a cut above on each side of the ball, The teams are dead even defensively on the ever important <\/body> This is Part-1 where the Center of the Handicapping Universe Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of the bowl games. This report entails games of Dec. 20-22. Navy-Utah The big underdogs Midshipmen have the numbers on the offensive side of the ball. They get 4.8 more first downs per game, 81.8 total yards … Continue reading 2007 College Bowl Previews, Part 1<\/span>
\nUniverse Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of
\nthe bowl games. This report entails games of Dec. 20-22. Navy-Utah
\noffensive side of the ball. They get 4.8 more first downs per game, 81.8 total
\nyards and 1.1 more yards per play. However while Navy gets 187.8 more rushing
\nyards per game,
\n106.1 more.
\npassing yards per attempt. Surprising to many, the
\n
\nyards per reception.
\nstats. They allow 6.2 fewer first downs per game, 118.4 fewer yards on 1.6 less
\nyards per play. They allow 3.1 less passing yards per attempt and they have a
\nmonster advantage in passing percentage allowing 18.7 less. The Utes have the
\nupper hand in turnover ratio by 11.
\nslight edges on the offensive side of the ball, but by only
\nhow close they are mathematically on offense, FAU<\/span>
\ngets .5 more passing yards per reception.
\nnot by much. They allow 22.4 less total yards per game and .6 less yards per
\nplay. The biggest edge by either team is on turnover ratio where Florida
\nAtlantic has a superiority of 13. Southern
\nMiss-Cincinnati
\nyards on .7 more yards per play. However, the Eagles get 18.4 more rushing
\nyards per game. Cincy<\/span> gets 1.9 more passing yards per
\nreception.
\nwith
\nthe Bearcats actually give up .3 fewer yards per play. While Cincinnati is
\nbetter against the run by
\nyards<\/st1:metricconverter> per game and a full yard per carry, Southern Miss
\nis superior by 44.2 passing yards per game, though it\u2019s Cincy<\/span>
\nallowing .1 less passing yards per attempt and .6 less per catch. As is the
\ncase with many statistically evenly matched squads, where the big advantage
\nlies is in the turnover margin category. Give that to
\nby a significant margin of 21.
\nsubstantial lead in every significant offensive category except completion
\npercentage in which
\ngets the edge by 4.8.
\n130.8 more total yards per game, 1.6 more yards per play. The edge is across
\nthe board 1.5 rushing yards per attempt, 2.2 passing yards per attempt and a
\nvery efficient 5.2 more passing yards per reception.
\nalso gets 6.2 more first downs per game.
\nhas the better statistical defense, but by slightly smaller margins. They allow
\n72.3 fewer total yards on 1.0 less yards per play. Talk about consistent, New
\nMexico allows 1.0 less rushing yards per attempt and 1.0 less passing yards per
\nattempt. UCLA-BYU<\/span>
\nespecially on offense. BYU<\/span> gets 125 more total yards
\nper game, led by 8.0 more first downs and 1.1 more yards per play. They also
\nget 1.6 more passing yards per attempt and complete a commanding 11.3 more
\npercent of their pass attempts.
\nyards per play category, though BYU<\/span> allows 39.5 less
\ntotal yards per game. All in all, the teams are extremely close in the major
\nhandicapping defensive comparisons. <\/p>\n
\noffering complete bowl packages for Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips for $149, Stevie
\nVincent\u2019s BetOnSports360 for $199 or both for $399. Both handicappers give
\ndetailed analysis on every pick. Sign up now at OffshoreInsiders.com<\/a><\/b>
\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"