{"id":12946,"date":"2012-07-14T12:36:47","date_gmt":"2012-07-14T17:36:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=12946"},"modified":"2012-07-14T12:36:47","modified_gmt":"2012-07-14T17:36:47","slug":"baseball-sample-report-of-key-play-of-the-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2012\/07\/baseball-sample-report-of-key-play-of-the-day\/","title":{"rendered":"Baseball Sample Report of Key Play of the Day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is the type of in-depth corroboration every day on the baseball version of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2011\/09\/sports-betting-breaking-news-key-play-of-the-day-added-to-offshoreinsiders-com\/\">Key Play of the Day<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Pittsburgh Pirates @ Milwaukee Brewers (McDonald\/Greinke)<\/p>\n<p>Line: Milwaukee (-138)<\/p>\n<p>5:10p<\/p>\n<p>Key Play of the Day: Milwaukee -138<\/p>\n<p>I.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Private database gives Milwaukee an 86.090 chance of covering to Milwaukee<\/p>\n<p>II.\u00a0\u00a0 The Pirates are 8-33 ($-2223) (-3.5 rpg) since May 16<sup>th<\/sup>, 2008 on the road when they won their starter\u2019s last two starts and their starter has less than seven days rest.<\/p>\n<p>III. The Brewers are 22-9 ($1257) (+2.6 rpg) since June 22, 2010 when they are off a win in which they scored more runs off the bullpen than they did off their opponent\u2019s starter.<\/p>\n<p>IV.\u00a0 Masseyratings has Milwaukee winning<\/p>\n<p>V.\u00a0\u00a0 Greinke 2012 9-3,\u00a0 3.32 ERA,\u00a0 1.23 ratio<\/p>\n<p>VI.\u00a0 Zack Greinke is 4-1 lifetime against the Pittsburgh Pirates<\/p>\n<p>VII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 James McDonald career at Miller Park 1-2, 6.00 ERA<\/p>\n<p>VIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Zach Greinke career at Miller Park \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 15-0, 2.68 ERA<\/p>\n<p>IX.\u00a0 When MILWAUKEE Played as home team as a Favorite &#8211; During Last 4 Years or Less &#8211; Won Last Game by 2 Runs or Less &#8211; With SU Record of 2 Win 3 Lost in L5G they are 16-4<\/p>\n<p>X.\u00a0\u00a0 Play On &#8211; Home teams (MILWAUKEE) &#8211; with a starting pitcher whose ERA is 3.70 or better on the season (NL) against opponent with a starting pitcher whose WHIP is 1.050 or better on the season-NL.<\/p>\n<p>XI.\u00a0 (204-139 since 1997.) (59.5%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Play On &#8211; Home teams (MILWAUKEE) &#8211; with a starting pitcher whose gives up 0.5 or less HR\u2019s\/start against opponent with a starting pitcher whose WHIP is 1.050 or better on the season-NL.<\/p>\n<p>XIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (183-134 since 1997.) (57.7%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XIV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; All underdogs with a money line of +125 to +175 (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; below average hitting team (AVG &lt;=.255) against a good starting pitcher (ERA &lt;=3.70) -NL, with a starting pitcher whose gives up 5.5 or less hits\/start.<\/p>\n<p>XV. (92-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XVI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Play On &#8211; Home favorites with a money line of -110 or higher (MILWAUKEE) &#8211; with a starting pitcher whose ERA is 3.70 or better on the season (NL) against opponent with a starting pitcher whose WHIP is 1.050 or better on the season-NL.<\/p>\n<p>XVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (109-47 since 1997.) (69.9%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XVIII.\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; All underdogs with a money line of +125 to +175 (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; bad offensive team (&lt;=4.1 runs\/game) against a good starting pitcher (ERA&lt;=3.70) (NL), with a starting pitcher whose gives up 5.5 or less hits\/start.<\/p>\n<p>XIX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (70-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.7%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*)<\/p>\n<p>XX. Play Against &#8211; All underdogs with a money line of +100 or higher (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; where team\u2019s hitters draw 3 walks or less\/game on the season, after a win by 10 runs or more.<\/p>\n<p>XXI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (69-23 since 1997.) (75%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*)<\/p>\n<p>XXII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; Road underdogs with a money line of +100 or higher (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; where team\u2019s hitters draw 3 walks or less\/game on the season, after a win by 10 runs or more.<\/p>\n<p>XXIII.\u00a0\u00a0 (48-11 since 1997.) (81.4%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*)<\/p>\n<p>XXIV.\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; All underdogs with a money line of +125 to +175 (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; poor hitting team (AVG &lt;=.250) against a good starting pitcher (ERA &lt;=3.70) -NL, with a starting pitcher whose gives up 5.5 or less hits\/start.<\/p>\n<p>XXV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (75-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)<\/p>\n<p>XXVI.\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; Any team (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; where team\u2019s hitters draw 3 walks or less\/game on the season, after a win by 10 runs or more.<\/p>\n<p>XXVII.\u00a0 (39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; Road underdogs with a money line of +125 to +175 (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; poor hitting team (AVG &lt;=.250) against a good starting pitcher (ERA &lt;=3.70) -NL, with a starting pitcher whose gives up 5.5 or less hits\/start.<\/p>\n<p>XXIX.\u00a0\u00a0 (57-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XXX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Play Against &#8211; All underdogs with a money line of +125 to +175 (PITTSBURGH) &#8211; with a starting pitcher whose gives up 5.5 or less hits\/start, in July games.<\/p>\n<p>XXXI.\u00a0\u00a0 (99-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +47.1 units. Rating = 3*)<\/p>\n<p>XXXII.\u00a0 Play On &#8211; All favorites with a money line of -110 or higher (MILWAUKEE) &#8211; with a tired bullpen &#8211; throwing 9+ innings over the last 2 games, in July games.<\/p>\n<p>XXXIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (142-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XXXIV. MILWAUKEE is 26-10 (+10.6 Units) against PITTSBURGH over the last 3 seasons<\/p>\n<p>XXXV.\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 16-5 (+8.1 Units) against PITTSBURGH over the last 3 seasons<\/p>\n<p>XXXVI. MCDONALD is 1-2 when starting against MILWAUKEE with an ERA of 6.61 and a WHIP of 1.408.<\/p>\n<p>XXXVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 20-59 (-27.5 Units) against the money line in road games in the second half of the season over the last 3 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>XXXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.5, OPPONENT 5.0 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>XXXIX. PITTSBURGH is 41-95 (-30.9 Units) against the money line in road games in night games over the last 3 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>XL. The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.5, OPPONENT 5.1 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>XLI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 215-320 (-79.9 Units) against the money line after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.<\/p>\n<p>XLII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 4.2, OPPONENT 4.9 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>XLIII.\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 79-156 (-71.1 Units) against the money line after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.<\/p>\n<p>XLIV.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.9, OPPONENT 4.9 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XLV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 160-303 (-82.0 Units) against the money line in road games after 2 straight games without a stolen base since 1997.<\/p>\n<p>XLVI.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 4.2, OPPONENT 5.3 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>XLVII.\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 47-18 (+25.2 Units) against the money line in home games after a win by 2 runs or less over the last 3 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>XLVIII. The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.3, OPPONENT 4.1 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>XLIX.\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 108-61 (+25.3 Units) against the money line as a favorite of -110 or higher over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>L.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.0, OPPONENT 4.0 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LI.\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 68-32 (+22.1 Units) against the money line as a favorite of -125 to -175 over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>LII. The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.0, OPPONENT 3.9 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 76-35 (+27.6 Units) against the money line as a home favorite of -110 or higher over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>LIV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.1, OPPONENT 4.3 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LV. MILWAUKEE is 49-19 (+21.7 Units) against the money line as a home favorite of -125 to -175 over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>LVI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.0, OPPONENT 4.2 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>LVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 84-47 (+23.7 Units) against the money line in home games over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>LVIII.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.0, OPPONENT 4.4 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LIX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 73-36 (+26.2 Units) against the money line at home when the total is 7 to 8.5 over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>LX. The average score was MILWAUKEE 5.0, OPPONENT 4.2 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LXI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 31-8 (+19.9 Units) against the money line as a favorite of -110 or higher over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 5.8, OPPONENT 3.7 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>LXIII.\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 18-5 (+11.1 Units) against the money line as a favorite of -125 to -175 over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXIV.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 6.0, OPPONENT 4.0 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>LXV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 36-14 (+19.0 Units) against the money line in all games over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXVI.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 5.2, OPPONENT 3.9 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LXVII.\u00a0 GREINKE is 31-11 (+17.2 Units) against the money line when the total is 7 to 8.5 over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXVIII. The average score was GREINKE 5.1, OPPONENT 3.8 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LXIX.\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 23-0 (+23.0 Units) against the money line as a home favorite of -110 or higher over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 6.2, OPPONENT 3.1 &#8211; (Rating = 6*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXI.\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 12-0 (+12.0 Units) against the money line as a home favorite of -125 to -175 over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXII.\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 6.4, OPPONENT 4.1 &#8211; (Rating = 3*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXIII. GREINKE is 23-1 (+22.0 Units) against the money line in home games over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXIV. The average score was GREINKE 6.0, OPPONENT 3.0 &#8211; (Rating = 5*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXV.\u00a0 GREINKE is 15-1 (+14.0 Units) against the money line at home when the total is 7.5 or less over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXVI. The average score was GREINKE 5.8, OPPONENT 3.1 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 15-0 (+15.0 Units) against the money line at home when the total is 7 to 7.5 over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 6.1, OPPONENT 3.1 &#8211; (Rating = 4*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXIX. GREINKE is 23-0 (+23.0 Units) against the money line at home when the total is 7 to 8.5 over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXX.\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 6.2, OPPONENT 3.1 &#8211; (Rating = 6*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXI. GREINKE is 12-0 (+12.0 Units) against the money line in home games in the second half of the season over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 5.7, OPPONENT 3.1 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 36-14 (+19.0 Units) against the money line in games played on a grass field over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXIV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 5.2, OPPONENT 3.9 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 24-8 (+14.6 Units) against the money line in night games over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXVI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 4.6, OPPONENT 3.6 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GREINKE is 15-1 (+14.0 Units) against the money line in home games after a win over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was GREINKE 5.3, OPPONENT 3.3 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>LXXXIX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 21-10 (+11.6 Units) against the money line when playing against a team with a losing record this season.<\/p>\n<p>XC. The average score was PITTSBURGH 4.4, OPPONENT 3.2 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XCI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 20-17 (+13.0 Units) against the money line in road games vs. an NL team with a team batting average of .245 or worse over the last 2 seasons.<\/p>\n<p>XCII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.8, OPPONENT 3.3 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>XCIII.\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 20-14 (+9.7 Units) against the money line vs. an NL team with a team batting average of .250 or worse this season.<\/p>\n<p>XCIV.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.6, OPPONENT 3.6 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>XCV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 24-14 (+14.0 Units) against the money line vs. an NL team with a team batting average of .255 or worse this season.<\/p>\n<p>XCVI.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.7, OPPONENT 3.4 &#8211; (Rating = 2*)<\/p>\n<p>XCVII.\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 28-20 (+11.1 Units) against the money line vs. an NL team with an on base percentage .325 or worse this season.<\/p>\n<p>XCVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.9, OPPONENT 3.6 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>XCIX.\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 30-24 (+11.8 Units) against the money line vs. teams whose hitters strike out 7 or more times\/game this season.<\/p>\n<p>C.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 4.0, OPPONENT 4.0 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CI.\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 16-10 (+8.0 Units) against the money line vs. a starting pitcher with good control (less than 1.75 BB\u2019s\/start) this season.<\/p>\n<p>CII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 4.2, OPPONENT 4.3 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 PITTSBURGH is 14-8 (+9.1 Units) against the money line vs. an NL starting pitcher whose ERA is 3.50 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CIV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.8, OPPONENT 3.8 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CV. PITTSBURGH is 15-10 (+7.3 Units) against the money line vs. a starting pitcher whose gives up 0.5 or less HR\u2019s\/start this season.<\/p>\n<p>CVI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was PITTSBURGH 3.4, OPPONENT 3.6 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>CVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MCDONALD is 10-3 (+9.4 Units) against the money line vs. an NL team with a team batting average of .245 or worse over the last 2 seasons. (Team\u2019s Record)<\/p>\n<p>CVIII.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MCDONALD 3.8, OPPONENT 2.6 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CIX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 113-167 (-48.0 Units) against the money line in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in the second half of the season since 1997.<\/p>\n<p>CX. The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.1, OPPONENT 5.2 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>CXI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 125-149 (-39.9 Units) against the money line vs. an NL team with a batting average of .255 or worse in the second half of the season since 1997.<\/p>\n<p>CXII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.5, OPPONENT 4.9 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>CXIII.\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 8-15 (-9.8 Units) against the money line vs. an excellent bullpen whose ERA is 3.00 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXIV.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 3.7, OPPONENT 4.2 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 13-19 (-10.1 Units) against the money line vs. a very good bullpen whose ERA is 3.33 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXVI.\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.4, OPPONENT 4.6 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXVII.\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 21-27 (-11.4 Units) against the money line vs. a good bullpen whose ERA is 3.75 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.2, OPPONENT 4.5 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXIX.\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 6-13 (-10.6 Units) against the money line vs. a good bullpen that converts on 75%+ of their save opportunities this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.6, OPPONENT 4.8 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXXI.\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 10-18 (-11.0 Units) against the money line vs. a very good bullpen whose WHIP is 1.250 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXXII.\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 3.8, OPPONENT 4.4 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXXIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 22-27 (-10.2 Units) against the money line vs. a good bullpen whose WHIP is 1.350 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXXIV. The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.1, OPPONENT 4.2 &#8211; (Rating = 0*)<\/p>\n<p>CXXV.\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 16-22 (-9.7 Units) against the money line vs teams who strand 6.9 or less runners on base per game this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXXVI. The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.6, OPPONENT 4.7 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXXVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MILWAUKEE is 7-15 (-9.9 Units) against the money line vs. an NL starting pitcher whose WHIP is 1.250 or better this season.<\/p>\n<p>CXXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The average score was MILWAUKEE 4.1, OPPONENT 6.1 &#8211; (Rating = 1*)<\/p>\n<p>CXXIX. Pirates are 80-168 in their last 248 road games.<\/p>\n<p>CXXX.\u00a0 Pirates are 77-165 in their last 242 games as a road underdog.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXI. Pirates are 64-138 in their last 202 road games vs. a right-handed starter.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Pirates are 51-113 in their last 164 road games with the total set at 7.0-8.5.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Pirates are 31-70 in their last 101 games as a road underdog of +110 to +150.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXIV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Pirates are 38-88 in their last 126 road games vs. a team with a losing record.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Pirates are 47-120 in their last 167 road games vs. a team with a winning home record<\/p>\n<p>CXXXVI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 4-0 in their last 4 home games with the total set at 7.0-8.5.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 4-1 in their last 5 Friday games.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 4-1 in their last 5 games vs. a right-handed starter.<\/p>\n<p>CXXXIX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 4-1 in their last 5 games with the total set at 7.0-8.5.<\/p>\n<p>CXL.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 6-2 in their last 8 home games vs. a team with a winning record.<\/p>\n<p>CXLI.\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 6-2 in their last 8 games as a favorite.<\/p>\n<p>CXLII.\u00a0 Brewers are 5-2 in their last 7 during game 1 of a series.<\/p>\n<p>CXLIII. Brewers are 12-5 in their last 17 when their opponent allows 2 runs or less in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>CXLIV. Brewers are 14-6 in their last 20 when their opponent scores 5 runs or more in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>CXLV.\u00a0 Brewers are 58-28 in their last 86 home games vs. a right-handed starter.<\/p>\n<p>CXLVI. Brewers are 68-33 in their last 101 games as a home favorite.<\/p>\n<p>CXLVII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 4-10 in their last 14 games vs. a starter with a WHIP less than 1.15.<\/p>\n<p>CXLVIII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 2-5 in their last 7 after scoring 5 runs or more in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>CXLIX. Brewers are 9-0 in Greinkes last 9 starts as a home favorite of -110 to -150.<\/p>\n<p>CL. Brewers are 4-0 in Greinkes last 4 starts vs. a team with a winning record.<\/p>\n<p>CLI.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 23-1 in Greinkes last 24 starts as a home favorite.<\/p>\n<p>CLII.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 23-1 in Greinkes last 24 home starts with the total set at 7.0-8.5.<\/p>\n<p>CLIII.\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 23-1 in Greinkes last 24 home starts.<\/p>\n<p>CLIV.\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 9-1 in Greinkes last 10 starts during game 1 of a series.<\/p>\n<p>CLV.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 8-1 in Greinkes last 9 home starts vs. a team with a winning record.<\/p>\n<p>CLVI.\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 6-1 in Greinkes last 7 Friday starts.<\/p>\n<p>CLVII.\u00a0 Brewers are 12-2 in Greinkes last 14 starts when their opponent allows 2 runs or less in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>CLVIII. Brewers are 15-3 in Greinkes last 18 starts when their opponent scores 5 runs or more in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>CLIX.\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 31-9 in Greinkes last 40 starts as a favorite.<\/p>\n<p>CLX.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 24-8 in Greinkes last 32 starts with the total set at 7.0-8.5.<\/p>\n<p>CLXI.\u00a0\u00a0 Brewers are 26-9 in Greinkes last 35 starts.<\/p>\n<p>CLXII.\u00a0 Brewers are 26-9 in Greinkes last 35 starts on grass.<\/p>\n<p>CLXIII. Brewers are 19-7 in Greinkes last 26 starts vs. National League Central.<\/p>\n<p>CLXIV. Pirates are 15-47 in the last 62 meetings.<\/p>\n<p>CLXV.\u00a0 Pirates are 8-44 in the last 52 meetings in Milwaukee.<\/p>\n<p>CLXVI. Betting market analysis suggests it is one of the strongest whale offshore bets all season on Milwaukee. In schmoes vs. Joes, most donk bettors are on Pittsburgh<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is the type of in-depth corroboration every day on the baseball version of the Key Play of the Day Pittsburgh Pirates @ Milwaukee Brewers (McDonald\/Greinke) Line: Milwaukee (-138) 5:10p Key Play of the Day: Milwaukee -138 I.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Private database gives Milwaukee an 86.090 chance of covering to Milwaukee II.\u00a0\u00a0 The Pirates are 8-33 ($-2223) &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2012\/07\/baseball-sample-report-of-key-play-of-the-day\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Baseball Sample Report of Key Play of the Day<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12946"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12946\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12949,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12946\/revisions\/12949"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}