Many a professional handicapper is publishing his For example, all of the touts I\u2019ve seen have forecasted We take conference foreboding an imperative step further. While this has proven enormously valuable for placing First of all, let\u2019s set the simple criterion. Stassen Of course the consensus is formed by ranking teams by lowest Major dichotomies are noted and teams are graded as For example, the Miami Hurricanes are modest -115 By no means do we gaze at just the top or for that matter Remember that the offshore odds take public perception Even the most accurate conference predictions can be Joe Duffy is CEO of <\/body> Joe Duffy (www.OffshoreInsiders.com) Many a professional handicapper is publishing his preseason college football predictions. Unfortunately, these prognostications can have limited value to the pointspread bettor, even if the conjecture turns out to be spot on. For example, all of the touts I\u2019ve seen have forecasted USC to win the Pac-10 and Stanford to finish dead … Continue reading Preseason Publications Help Isolate Overvalued and Undervalued Teams<\/span>
\npreseason college football predictions. Unfortunately, these prognostications
\ncan have limited value to the pointspread bettor, even if the conjecture turns
\nout to be spot on.
\nUSC to win the Pac-10 and Stanford to finish dead last.
\nprognostications to be flawless, yet the Cardinal could still finish with a
\nbetter record against the spread than the Trojans.
\nBorrowing the research done at Stassen.com, over the years we have compared and
\ncontrasted the consensus predictions of the respected preseason college
\nfootball publications to the offshore odds.
\nfutures bets, it is even more advantageous in compiling a \u201ccheat sheet\u201d of
\novervalued and undervalued teams entering the season.
\ntakes 12 preseason publications and uses a basic point system to compile a
\nconsensus. <\/span>If a periodical predicts a
\nteam to win their conference, they are assigned one point.
\nprediction, three for third and so on.
\npoint total to highest. Better yet, the specific point compilation helps us
\n\u201crate\u201d teams (see previous articles about the difference between rating and
\nranking). We compare the Stassen research to the odds to win a conference or
\ndivision as posted by BetUs Sportsbook.
\novervalued, extremely overvalued, undervalued, extremely undervalued, or at
\nvalue.
\nfavorites to win the ACC Coastal even though Virginia Tech at even money is the
\nunanimous choice to win according to the preseason magazines. Yet, GA Tech is
\nat +775 even though they are dead-even with
\naccording to the 12 modules. <\/span>We flag
\nVirginia Tech as \u201cat value\u201d,
\nas \u201covervalued\u201d and GA Tech as \u201cextremely undervalued\u201d.
\nthe bottom of the standings for an edge.
\n<\/span>For example
\nthe second long shot in the Big 10 at +3500. However, they are a comfortable
\nseventh (remember there are 11 teams in the Big 10) in the compilation.
\ninto account. <\/span>No publication is perfect,
\nbut we have found the rated assemblage of the numerous sources to be more
\naccurate in distinguishing the talent levels of the teams.
\nflawed to the gambler because betting odds are the great equalizer. Our system
\nof contrasting the data with the betting odds gives sharp players the premier
\npreseason sports betting cheat sheet. <\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/b>home of free picks, live scores and odds, sports betting databases
\nand the famed Tailgate
\nParty<\/a>, news and notes of interest to the online bettor compiled from
\nhometown newspapers.
\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"