{"id":1085,"date":"2006-12-19T17:56:59","date_gmt":"2006-12-19T22:56:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2006\/12\/bowl-breakdowns-part-2\/"},"modified":"2006-12-19T17:56:59","modified_gmt":"2006-12-19T22:56:59","slug":"bowl-breakdowns-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2006\/12\/bowl-breakdowns-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Bowl Breakdowns, Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

This is Part-2 where the Center of the Handicapping
\nUniverse Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of
\nthe bowl games. This report entails games of December 26-28.<\/o:p><\/p>\n

Middle Tennessee State-Central
\nMichigan<\/span><\/st1:place><\/o:p><\/span><\/h1>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Central Michigan<\/st1:place> gets 84
\nmore total yards per game on offense, though MTSU<\/span> has
\na small 10.9 yards per game edge offensively<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>CMU leads offensively in rushing yards per
\nattempt by .4, passing yards per attempt by 1.5 and completion percentage by
\n7.0<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Middle Tennessee<\/st1:place><\/st1:State>
\nallows 16.7 less rushing yards per game but Central Michigan<\/st1:place>
\nhas a slight edge in passing defense at 8.5<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>CMU allows 1.5 less passing yards per attempt
\nand 3.3 less passing yards per reception<\/o:p><\/p>\n
<\/o:p><\/p>\n
Florida State-UCLA<\/o:p><\/span><\/h1>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The teams are nearly dead even offensively with
\nFSU getting 29.2 more passing yards per game and UCLA 28.6 rushing yards per
\ngame <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Defensively FSU allows 1.8 less first downs per
\ngame and 25.9 fewer yards per game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>FSU has a small edge in most defensive
\ncategories<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>UCLA has a mammoth turnover ratio edge of 16<\/o:p><\/p>\n
<\/o:p><\/p>\n
Oklahoma State-Alabama<\/o:p><\/span><\/h1>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Offensively OSU<\/span> gets
\n3.4 more first downs per game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>OSU<\/span> averages 68.1 more
\ntotal yards per game on offense, led by an 83.7 rushing yards per game edge<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The Cowboys lead in passing yards per attempt by
\n1.6, passing yards per attempt by 1.1 and passing yards per reception by 2.5<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Alabama<\/st1:place><\/st1:State>
\ncompletes 2.6 percent more of the pass attempts<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Alabama<\/st1:place><\/st1:State>
\nallows 6.4 fewer first downs per game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The Crimson Tide has a defensive advantage of
\n83.8 total yards per game on 32.2 rushing yards per game and 51.7 passing<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Alabama<\/st1:place><\/st1:State>
\nallows 5.2 less pass completion percentage<\/o:p><\/p>\n
<\/o:p><\/p>\n
Kansas State-Rutgers<\/o:p><\/span><\/h1>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rutgers<\/st1:place> gets 2.2 more
\nfirst downs per game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The Scarlet Knights average 55.4 more rushing
\nyards per game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Kansas<\/st1:PlaceName>
\nState<\/st1:PlaceType><\/st1:place> has the passing yards per
\ngame edge by 49.5<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rutgers<\/st1:place> has the upper
\nhand in both rushing yards per attempt by .5 and passing yards per attempt by
\n.6<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rutgers<\/st1:place> completes 3.5
\npercent more of the pass attempts<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>On defense, Rutgers<\/st1:place>
\nallows 74.8 less total yards per game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rutgers<\/st1:place> allows .9 less
\nrushing yards per attempt<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Kansas<\/st1:PlaceName>
\nState<\/st1:PlaceType><\/st1:place> gets the defensive advantage
\nin passing yards per reception by 1.2<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rutgers<\/st1:place> allows a
\ncompletion percentage of 6.3 less<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The Scarlet Knights turnover ratio edge is 8<\/o:p><\/p>\n
<\/o:p><\/p>\n
Texas<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:State> A&M-California<\/o:p><\/span><\/h1>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Texas A&M gets 54.3 more rushing yards per
\ngame but Cal<\/st1:place><\/st1:State> gets 63.8 more
\npassing yards<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Most other offensive categories are close, but
\nthe Aggies<\/span> have a 3.0 completion percentage upper
\nhand on offense<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Defensively A&M allows 57.8 less total yards
\nper game <\/o:p><\/p>\n
\u00b7
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The Aggies<\/span> allow 1.0
\nless passing yards per attempt and 1.3 less passing yards per reception <\/o:p><\/p>\n
<\/o:p><\/p>\n
Get the winners on each game from the top experts at OffshoreInsiders.com<\/b><\/a>
\n <\/span><\/o:p><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/body>
\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This is Part-2 where the Center of the Handicapping Universe Joe Duffy\u2019s GodsTips.com breaks down the statistical comparisons of the bowl games. This report entails games of December 26-28. Middle Tennessee State-Central Michigan \u00b7        Central Michigan gets 84 more total yards per game on offense, though MTSU has a small 10.9 yards per game edge … Continue reading Bowl Breakdowns, Part 2<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_gambling_strategy_articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1085"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1085\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}