{"id":10027,"date":"2011-01-02T04:46:40","date_gmt":"2011-01-02T04:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=10027"},"modified":"2011-01-02T04:46:40","modified_gmt":"2011-01-02T04:46:40","slug":"nfl-handicapping-week-17-bears-vs-packers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2011\/01\/nfl-handicapping-week-17-bears-vs-packers\/","title":{"rendered":"NFL Handicapping Week 17 Bears vs. Packers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the best <a href=\"http:\/\/scoresoddspicks.com\/\">Vegas scores and odds<\/a> contests this week in football is the clash between the Bears vs. Packers.<\/p>\n<p>The current Vegas point spread is Green Bay -9.5 with a total of 42 or 42.5.<\/p>\n<p>The best <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bettorsadvice.com\/\">sports picks<\/a> experts use different key handicapping numbers than the square player. Here is a preview of that game from a handicapping standpoint.<\/p>\n<p>In comparing yards per rush on offense, the superiority from a statistical standpoint goes to Green Bay by .1.<\/p>\n<p>Passing yards per completion is another gauge utilized by bettors. The advantage is possessed by the Green Bay Packers by .3.<\/p>\n<p>Possibly the most utilized number by professional bettors is yards per point. From the offensive viewpoint the positive checkmark is in the column of the Chicago Bears by 1.1.<\/p>\n<p>Now go to the key numbers on the defensive side of the ball. The yards per rush guide says the better run defense is Chicago by .8.<\/p>\n<p>The superior passing yards per completion data on defense give the upper hand to the Bears by .9.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of yards per point, the better defense is Green Bay by 2.7. Turnover margin is the Green Bay Packers by six.<\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/\"><strong>football handicapping<\/strong><\/a><strong> picks and prediction <\/strong>in the sports service industry is Wow, what a bowl season. GodsTips is on a 5-1 overall run with Wise Guys. Get three Sunday NFL including a Wise Guy as the hard work continues to pay off big time for us all. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">GodsTips week 17 NFL picks<\/a> are now up and include this contest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Spread betting trends <\/strong>(all records are against the spread): Chicago is 8-22 as a road underdog of 3.5-10.0.<\/p>\n<p>Green Bay 19-9 to NFC North.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Over\/under trends: <\/strong> Chicago has gone over 8-0 in January, yet under 42-18 as road underdogs.<\/p>\n<p>Green Bay under 7-1 off win and the series has gone under five straight.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the best Vegas scores and odds contests this week in football is the clash between the Bears vs. Packers. The current Vegas point spread is Green Bay -9.5 with a total of 42 or 42.5. The best sports picks experts use different key handicapping numbers than the square player. Here is a preview &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2011\/01\/nfl-handicapping-week-17-bears-vs-packers\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">NFL Handicapping Week 17 Bears vs. Packers<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10027"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10027\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10029,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10027\/revisions\/10029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}