{"id":10024,"date":"2011-01-02T04:02:44","date_gmt":"2011-01-02T04:02:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/?p=10024"},"modified":"2011-01-02T04:02:44","modified_gmt":"2011-01-02T04:02:44","slug":"jaguars-vs-texans-nfl-picks-week-17","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2011\/01\/jaguars-vs-texans-nfl-picks-week-17\/","title":{"rendered":"Jaguars vs. Texans NFL Picks Week 17"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week\u2019s NFL football schedule includes a contest between the Jaguars vs. Texans. Houston is -3 with a total of 45.5.<\/p>\n<p>OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lines-maker.com\/p\/nfl-football-betting.html\">football betting<\/a> match-up using key numbers employed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/\">professional gamblers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In comparing yards per rush on offense, the better numbers belong to Houston, but by just .1.<\/p>\n<p>As far as passing yards per completion on the offensive side of the ball, the upper hand is for, it\u2019s the Texans by .7.<\/p>\n<p>According to yards per point, the more efficient offense is Jacksonville by .7.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively the more stingy team based on yards per rush is Houston by .6.<\/p>\n<p>The superior defense in terms of passing yards per completion the Jacksonville Jaguars by .1.<\/p>\n<p>The yards per point statistic used by the best <a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/\">sports handicappers<\/a> says the superior defense is Jacksonville forcing .3 more. Turnovers see Houston with a ratio advantage of nine.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who to bet on according to the <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?PageID=140\"><strong>football betting experts<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong>against the spread. Wow, what a bowl season. GodsTips is on a 5-1 overall run with Wise Guys. Get three Sunday NFL including a Wise Guy as the hard work continues to pay off big time for us all. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.offshoreinsiders.com\/index.php?Page=Packages\">GodsTips week 17 NFL picks<\/a> are now up including a Wise Guy on this game.<\/p>\n<p>Yards per point is determined by diving total yards by number of points. Offensively a lower number is considered more efficient. On defense, a higher number is better.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Spread betting trends <\/strong>(all records are against the spread): Jacksonville 5-0 after allowing less than 90 yards rushing in their previous game, 4-11 after accumulating more than 250 yards passing in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>Texans are 2-7 to AFC, 1-6 after accumulating more than 250 yards passing in their previous game, 1-7 off spread loss.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Over\/under trends: <\/strong>Jacksonville over 7-1 road, over 10-2 to AFC, but under 10-3 after accumulating more than 250 yards passing in their previous game.<\/p>\n<p>Houston over 6-1 after allowing more than 250 yards passing in their previous game, over 22-8 to teams with a winning record, over 21-7 following a ATS loss, over 21-9 after accumulating more than 350 total yards in their previous game.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week\u2019s NFL football schedule includes a contest between the Jaguars vs. Texans. Houston is -3 with a total of 45.5. OffshoreInsiders.com takes a look at the football betting match-up using key numbers employed by professional gamblers. In comparing yards per rush on offense, the better numbers belong to Houston, but by just .1. As &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/2011\/01\/jaguars-vs-texans-nfl-picks-week-17\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Jaguars vs. Texans NFL Picks Week 17<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sports_betting_news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10024"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10024\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10026,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10024\/revisions\/10026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.joeduffy.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}